机器抽取自官方 PDF(https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/dd9c07d6-9b29-4f94-8fb7-4c2d44906109/content),获取时间 2026-10-22;抽取可能丢失排版与图表,引用与临床判断请以原文为准。
本文著作权归世界卫生组织(WHO),以 CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO 许可发布(creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/);本站为非商业学习与检索用途,按许可要求署名并标明来源。
Global oral
health status
report
Towards universal
health coverage for
oral health by 2030
Global oral health status report: towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
ISBN 978-92-4-006148-4 (electronic version)
ISBN 978-92-4-006149-1 (print version)
© World Health Organization 2022
Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence
(CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo).
Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work
is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific
organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your
work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a translation of this work, you should add the following
disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not
responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”.
Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World
Intellectual Property Organization (http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules/).
Suggested citation. Global oral health status report: towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2022. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data. CIP data are available at http://apps.who.int/iris.
Sales, rights and licensing. To purchase WHO publications, see http://apps.who.int/bookorders. To submit requests for commercial
use and queries on rights and licensing, see https://www.who.int/copyright.
Third-party materials. If you wish to reuse material from this work that is attributed to a third party, such as tables, figures or
images, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed for that reuse and to obtain permission from the copyright
holder. The risk of claims resulting from infringement of any third-party-owned component in the work rests solely with the user.
General disclaimers. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression
of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WHO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities,
or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted and dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines
for which there may not yet be full agreement.
The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended
by WHO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary
products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
All reasonable precautions have been taken by WHO to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published
material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation
and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall WHO be liable for damages arising from its use.
Design and layout: Julie Pudlowski Consulting
Front cover photograph: Julie Pudlowski
Global oral health
status report
Towards universal health coverage
for oral health by 2030
©Julie Pudlowski
Contents
Foreword
v
Acknowledgements
vii
List of abbreviations
x
Introduction
1
1. Oral diseases are global public health problems
5
1.1 Oral diseases – an increasing global burden
7
1.2 Oral diseases – common determinants and risk factors
15
1.3 Oral diseases – individual and population impacts along the life course
19
1.4 Oral diseases – global inequalities in the burden
22
1.5 Oral diseases – inequalities in access to oral health services
23
1.6 Oral diseases – global expenditures and economic impact of oral diseases
26
2. The burden of the main oral diseases
29
2.1 Dental caries
30
2.2 Severe periodontal disease
37
2.3 Edentulism
41
2.4 Oral cancer
45
2.5 Other oral conditions of public health relevance
52
3. Challenges and opportunities towards oral health for all
59
3.1 Health service and models of oral health care
60
3.2 Global oral health workforce
62
3.3 Fluorides for oral health
66
3.4 Oral health information and research challenges
70
3.5 Issues of public health relevance in oral health care
73
3.6 Reorientation on primary oral health care and UHC
79
4. A road map towards UHC for oral health
83
5. References
87
iii
©Julie Pudlowski
Foreword
Oral diseases are among the most common noncommunicable diseases worldwide, affecting an estimated
3.5 billion people. The burden is increasing, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
Good oral health is essential for eating, breathing and speaking, and contributes to overall health, well-being
and confidence in interacting with others. But oral health is challenged by a range of diseases and conditions,
and stark and persistent inequalities in the burden of disease and access to oral health care. Disadvantaged
and marginalized people are more likely to be at risk of oral diseases and their negative consequences.
The good news is that many oral diseases can be prevented and treated. Cost-effective preventive and clinical
interventions are available, together with approaches to tackle risks common to all noncommunicable
diseases, with the potential to be effective in a range of contexts, including low- and middle-income countries.
Oral health has long been neglected in the global health agenda. Our biggest challenge now is ensuring that
all people, wherever they live and whatever their income, have the knowledge and tools needed to look
after their teeth and mouths, and access to prevention and care when they need it. For this to happen, all
countries need sufficient staff trained in oral health, and oral health services must be included in national
health coverage packages, either free of charge or at a price that people can afford.
The adoption by WHO Member States of a historic resolution on oral health at the World Health Assembly in
2021 was an important step forward. The development and adoption of a comprehensive Global Strategy on
Oral Health, with a bold vision for universal coverage of oral health services by 2030 was another milestone. The
Global Oral Health Action Plan to be discussed in 2023 will include a monitoring framework, with clear targets
to be achieved by 2030. These policies will provide us with a clear path towards ensuring oral health for all.
This WHO Global oral health status report provides a comprehensive picture of the oral disease burden, the
resources available for oral health, and the challenges ahead.
The report also includes country profiles, and will serve as a baseline for tracking progress. Integrating oral
health promotion and care into primary health care and UHC benefit packages will be key to success. WHO
is committed to providing guidance and support to countries to help make this happen.
I am confident that this report will contribute to continued and increased efforts to improve oral health
globally, so that no one is left behind with preventable and treatable oral diseases.
Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus
Director-General, World Health Organization
v
©WHO
©WHO
The World Health Organization (WHO) is grateful for the contributions that many individuals and organizations
have made over several years to the development of this report.
The WHO Global oral health status report was produced by the Department of Noncommunicable Diseases,
Universal Health Coverage/Communicable and Noncommunicable Diseases (UCN) division of the World
Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland (WHO HQ), under the initial general guidance of Douglas
Bettcher, Director, Prevention of Noncommunicable Diseases Department, and later of Bente Mikkelsen,
Director, Department of Noncommunicable Diseases and Slim Slama, Unit Head, Noncommunicable Diseases
Management-Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment, Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, and under the
lead of Benoit Varenne, Dental Officer, Oral Health Programme, Department of Noncommunicable Diseases.
Steering committee
Faten Ben Abdelaziz (WHO HQ); Habib Benzian (WHO Collaborating Centre, New York University, New
York City, United States of America); Dongbo Fu (WHO HQ); Yuriko Harada (WHO HQ); Jason Ligot (WHO
HQ); Stefan Listl (Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands); Wagner Marcenes (Global Burden of
Disease Oral Health Collaborators Group, King’s College, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Northern Ireland); Yuka Makino (WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo); Poul Erik Petersen
(WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Copenhagen, Denmark); Nicole Rendell (WHO HQ); Leanne Riley
(WHO HQ); Benoit Varenne (WHO HQ); Akihito Watabe (WHO HQ); and Richard Watt (WHO Collaborating
Centre, University College, London, United Kingdom).
Editorial committee
Habib Benzian (WHO Collaborating Centre, New York University, New York City, United States); Yuka Makino
(WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo); Nicole Stauf (London School of Hygiene and Tropical
Medicine, London, United Kingdom); Benoit Varenne (WHO HQ); and Richard Watt ( London, United Kingdom).
Report development
WHO is very grateful to Habib Benzian and Richard Watt for their editorial leadership and technical writing
skills during the development of the report.
WHO also thanks the following individuals whose dedicated efforts and expertise contributed to the
development of the report: Huda Abdul Ghaffar (WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean); Samira
Asma (WHO HQ); Paul Brennan (IARC, Lyon, France); Alison Ruth Brunier, (WHO HQ); Andre Carvalho (IARC,
Lyon, France) Somnath Chatterji (WHO HQ); Khassoum Diallo, (WHO HQ); Gampo Dorji (WHO Regional Office
for South-East Asia); Diana Estevez Fernandez (WHO HQ); Jill Louise Farrington (WHO Regional Office for
Europe); Riitta-maija Hämälainen (WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific); Hayatee Hasan (WHO HQ);
Acknowledgements
vii
Carolina Hommes (WHO Regional Office for the Americas); Andre Ilbawi (WHO HQ); Ratnasabapathipillai
Kesavan, (WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia); Teena Kuniumen, (WHO HQ); Beatrice Lauby-Secretan
(IARC, Lyon, France) Amit Prasad (WHO HQ); Vinayak Prasad (WHO HQ); Felipe Roitberg (WHO HQ); Stefan
Savin (WHO HQ); Deependra Singh (IARC, Lyon, France); Slim Slama (WHO HQ); Yves Turgeon (WHO HQ);
Menno Van Hilten (WHO HQ); Cherian Varghese (WHO HQ); Khan Wasiq Mehmood (WHO Regional Office
for the Eastern Mediterranean).
External reviewers
Aluísio J D Barros (Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Brazil); Lois K. Cohen (National Institute of Dental and
Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Washington DC, United States); Stefan Listl (Radboud
University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands); Wagner Marcenes (Global Burden of Disease Oral Health Group,
King’s College, London, United Kingdom); Sudeshni Naidoo (WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Health,
University of the Western Cape, Bellville, Republic of South Africa); Richard Niederman (WHO Collaborating
Centre, New York University, New York City, United States); Srinath Reddy (Public Health Foundation of India,
Gurugram, India); Viroj Tangcharoensathien (International Health Policy Program, Nonthaburi, Thailand);
and Stéphanie Tubert-Jeannin (Université Clermont Auvergne, France).
Other contributors
WHO is grateful to the following WHO Collaborating Centres, consultants and external experts who
contributed to the development of specific sections of the report, to the implementation of WHO-led global
surveys at different stages of the development of the report, and/or to regional consultations organized:
Jun Aida (Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan); Eduardo Bernabé (Global Burden of Disease Oral Health
Collaborators Group, King’s College, London, United Kingdom); Pascal Bovet (University of Lausanne,
Switzerland); Christian Bradley (Western NSW Local Health District, Dubbo, Australia); Peter Carlsson
(WHO Collaborating Centre, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden); David Conway (University of Glasgow,
United Kingdom); Sarah Crummey (King’s College, London, United Kingdom); Elisabeth Dimba (University of
Nairobi, Kenya); Duangthip Duangporn (University of Hong Kong, China, Hong Kong Special Administrative
Region (Hong Kong SAR, China); Ritu Duggal (WHO Collaborating Centre, All India Institute of Medical
Sciences, New Delhi, India); Maha El Tantawi (Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi
Arabia); Denise Faulks (Université Clermont Auvergne, France); Carlos Feldens (Universidade Luterana do
Brasil, São José, Brazil); Jenny Gallagher (King’s College, London, United Kingdom); Nicolas Giraudeau
(Université de Montpellier, France); Athanasios Gkekas (University of York, United Kingdom); Mairead Harding
(University College, Cork, Ireland); Anja Heilmann (University College, London, United Kingdom); Milica
Jevdjevic (Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands); Newell Johnson (Griffith University, Brisbane,
Australia); Raksanan Karawekpanyawong (WHO Collaborating Centre, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan);
Cristin Kearns (University of California, San Francisco, United States); O.P. Kharbanda (WHO Collaboration
Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India); Yu Kubota (WHO Collaborating Centre,
Niigata University, Niigata, Japan); Özlem Elmas Lubino (Saint-Genis-Pouilly, France); Lorna Macpherson
(University of Glasgow, United Kingdom); Manu Raj Mathur (Public Health Foundation of India, Gurugram,
India); Grazielle Mattos Savage (King’s College, London, United Kingdom); Afshan Mirza (University College,
London, United Kingdom); Peter Mossey (University of Dundee, United Kingdom); Paula Moynihan (University
viii
of Adelaide, Australia); Margaret Namusisi (Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda); Belinda Nicolau (McGill
University, Montreal, Canada); Kaname Nohno (WHO Collaborating Centre, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan);
Hiroshi Ogawa (WHO Collaborating Centre, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan); Emmanuel Otho (Regional
Center for Oral Health Research, Jos, Nigeria); Prathip Phanthumvanit (Association of Asian Chief Dental
Officers, Thailand); Ave Pöld (International Association of Dental Students, Estonia); Kohei Tamura (WHO
Collaborating Centre, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan); James Taylor (Section of Chief Dental Officers and
Dental Public Health, FDI World Dental Federation, and Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Canada);
George Tsakos (University College London, United Kingdom); Kasturi Warnakulasuriya (WHO Collaborating
Centre, King’s College, London, United Kingdom); Tao Xu (WHO Collaborating Centre, Peking University,
Beijing, China); Shanshan Zhang (WHO Collaborating Centre, Peking University, Beijing, China); and Shuguo
Zheng (WHO Collaborating Centre, Peking University, Beijing, China).
WHO is grateful to Samira Asma (WHO HQ) for facilitating collaboration with the Institute for Health Metrics
and Evaluation (IHME) at the University of Washington, Seattle, United States, who provided access to data
on oral diseases from the Global Burden of Disease Project (2019). At the IHME, WHO especially thanks Kelly
Bienhoff, Lisa Force, Nick Kassebaum, Rafael Lozano and Meghan Mooney.
WHO thanks all those mentioned in the case studies for their collaboration and for sharing their own
experiences and personal insights: Semiyu Adetunji Adeniyi, Voramon Agrasuta, Philippe Aubert, Maria
Corazon Dumlao, Claire Jeantet, Mulikat Okanlawon, Victor Oluwalomola, Mary Otto, Warisa Panichkriangkrai,
Norman Tinanoff, Noel Vallesteros, Shashank Wani, Rahul Wankhede, Sakuji Yanadori and Pascal Zoungrana.
WHO owes a very special thanks to Ricardo Martinez and Lucero Lopez Perez, Octoma Consultants Team,
Mexico, for their expert data analysis and visualizations.
WHO acknowledges with gratitude the funds received from the WHO voluntary contributions of the Borrow
Foundation, United Kingdom, and Hilfsaktion Noma e.V., Germany.
ix
AMR
Antimicrobial resistance
CCS
Country Capacity Survey
CPI
Community Periodontal Index
DALY
disability-adjusted life year
DATs
dental assistants and therapists
DMFT
decayed, missing and filled teeth
DPTs
dental prosthetists/technicians
GBD
Global Burden of Disease
GSHS
Global School-based Student Health Survey
HPV
human papillomavirus
HTA
health technology assessment
IARC
International Agency for Research on Cancer
IHME
Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation
ILO
International Labour Organization
IPC
infection prevention and control
ITU
International Telecommunication Union
mHealth
mobile health
NCD
noncommunicable disease
NGO
nongovernmental organization
NHWA
National Health Workforce Account
OFC
orofacial clefts
PHC
primary health care
SDGs
Sustainable Development Goals
SSB
sugar-sweetened beverage
UHC
universal health coverage
UN
United Nations
UNICEF
United Nations Children’s Fund
WB
World Bank
WHO
World Health Organization
WHO EML/c
WHO model list of essential medicines for adults and children
List of abbreviations
x
Fig. 1
Ranking of most prevalent conditions per WB country income level
8
Fig. 2
Comparison of estimated global case numbers for selected NCDs
9
Fig. 3
Estimated case numbers and prevalence of the major oral diseases combined per WB
country income group (excluding lip/oral cavity cancer)
9
Fig. 4
Estimated case numbers and prevalence of the major oral diseases combined per
WHO region (excluding lip/oral cavity cancer)
10
Fig. 5
Estimated case numbers of the major oral diseases combined between 1990 and 2019
per WB country income group (excluding lip/oral cavity cancer)
11
Fig. 6
Estimated population change between 1990 and 2019 by WB country income group
12
Fig. 7
Comparison of estimated global DALYs for selected NCDs
13
Fig. 8
Social and commercial determinants of oral diseases
15
Fig. 9
Common risk factors for NCDs and oral health
17
Fig. 10
Prevalence rates of four major oral diseases over the life course
19
Fig. 11
Selected impacts of oral diseases
21
Fig. 12
Comparison of edentulism by educational attainment in different populations
(in percentage of edentulous population)
23
Fig. 13
Per capita direct dental expenditure in US$ per WB country income group (2019)
27
Fig. 14
Total direct dental expenditure in US$ per WB country income group (2019)
27
Fig. 15
Per capita dental expenditures in US$ per country (2019)
28
Fig. 16
Estimated prevalence of dental caries of deciduous teeth per country
31
Fig. 17
Estimated cases and prevalence of caries of deciduous teeth per WB country
income group
32
Fig. 18
Estimated cases and prevalence of caries of deciduous teeth per WHO region
33
Fig. 19
Estimated cases and prevalence of caries of permanent teeth per WB income group
34
List of figures
xi
Fig. 20
Estimated prevalence of caries of permanent teeth per country
35
Fig. 21
Estimated cases and prevalence of caries of permanent teeth per WHO region
38
Fig. 22
Estimated cases and prevalence of severe periodontal disease per WB country
income group
38
Fig. 23
Estimated prevalence of severe periodontal disease per country
39
Fig. 24
Estimated cases and prevalence of severe periodontal disease per WHO region
39
Fig. 25
Estimated cases and prevalence of edentulism per WB country income group
42
Fig. 26
Estimated cases and prevalence of edentulism per WHO region
43
Fig. 27
Estimated prevalence of edentulism
44
Fig. 28
Incidence and mortality rates of lip and oral cavity cancer per WB country income group
46
Fig. 29
Incidence and mortality rates of lip and oral cavity cancer per WHO region
46
Fig. 30
Estimated incidence rates of lip and oral cavity cancer
47
Fig. 31
Estimated mortality rates of lip and oral cavity cancer
47
Fig. 32
Estimated numbers of new cases and percentage share of total cases of lip and oral
cavity cancer per WB country income group (2020)
51
Fig. 33
Estimated numbers of new cases and percentage share of total cases of lip and oral
cavity cancer per WHO region (2020)
51
Fig. 34
Estimated cases and prevalence of OFCs by WB Income group
52
Fig. 35
Estimated cases and prevalence of OFCs by WHO region
53
Fig. 36
Workforce for oral health – dentist density
64
Fig. 37
Uses of oral health information
71
Fig. 38
Conceptual model of the primary oral health care pyramid
80
Fig . 39
The primary oral health care operational framework
82
xii
Table 1.
Percentage change in estimated prevalence, case numbers and DALYs of the major oral
diseases (except lip and oral cavity cancer) and change in population by WB country
income group
11
Table 2.
Estimated prevalence and cases of caries of deciduous teeth in 2019 and the percentage
change from 1990 to 2019 per WB country income group
31
Table 3.
Estimated prevalence and case numbers of caries of deciduous teeth in 2019
and their percentage change from 1990 to 2019 per WHO region
32
Table 4.
Estimated prevalence and cases of caries of permanent teeth in 2019
and the percentage change of prevalence, cases and population from 1990 to 2019
per WB country income group
34
Table 5.
Estimated prevalence and cases of caries of permanent teeth in 2019 and the percentage
change of prevalence, cases and population from 1990 to 2019 per WHO region
35
Table 6.
Estimated prevalence and cases of severe periodontal disease in 2019 and the
percentage change of prevalence, cases and population from 1990 to 2019 per WB
country income group
38
Table 7.
Estimated prevalence and cases of severe periodontal disease in 2019
and the percentage change of prevalence, cases and population from 1990 to 2019
per WHO region
40
Table 8.
Estimated prevalence and cases of edentulism in 2019 and the percentage change of
prevalence, cases and population from 1990 to 2019 per WB country income group
42
Table 9.
Estimated prevalence and case numbers of edentulism in 2019 and the percentage
change of prevalence, cases and population from 1990 to 2019 per WHO region
43
Table 10.
Estimated prevalence, case numbers and DALYs of OFCs and their percentage changes
from 1990 to 2019 per WB country income group
53
Table 11.
Estimated prevalence, case numbers and DALYs of OFCs and their percentage changes
from 1990 to 2019 per WHO region
54
Table 12.
Global oral health workforce by WB country income group
64
Table 13.
Global oral health workforce by WHO region
66
List of tables
xiii
Box 1.
Oral diseases – a large group of diseases and conditions
6
Box 2.
Data sources for the burden of oral diseases and other information
7
Box 3.
Understanding and interpreting the oral disease burden
12
Box 4.
What is a disability-adjusted life year?
14
Box 5.
Health expenditure definitions
26
Box 6.
What is dental caries and how is it measured?
30
Box 7.
What is severe periodontal disease?
38
Box 8.
Definition of oral cancer
45
Box 9.
Betel quid: a dangerous yet popular carcinogen
49
Box 10.
IARC handbook Vol. 19 - on oral cancer prevention
49
Box 11.
The Regional Noma Control Programme in the WHO African Region
57
Box 12.
Results from the 2021 Global WHO surveys assessing country capacity for oral health
62
Box 13.
Who is part of the oral health workforce?
63
Box 14.
Affordability of essential medicines: the case of fluoride toothpaste in 78 countries
67
Box 15.
Self-care and maintaining oral health
69
Box 16.
Fluoride-containing products on the WHO model list of essential medicines
70
Box 17.
Minamata Convention on Mercury measures to phase down the use of dental amalgam
74
List of boxes
xiv
Case study 1.
Promoting oral health as essential to healthy ageing (Japan)
20
Case study 2.
The challenge of oral health care for people living with disabilities (France)
24
Case study 3.
Reforming access to oral health care to address disparities (United States)
25
Case Study 4.
Two betel nut consumers and their battles with oral cancer (India)
50
Case Study 5.
Supporting survivors of noma (Nigeria)
56
Case Study 6.
Delivering oral health care to rural communities (Burkina Faso)
65
Case Study 7.
Making good oral health part of the daily school routine (Philippines)
68
Case Study 8.
Oral health benefits and school oral health as part of UHC (Thailand)
81
List of case studies
xv
©Julie Pudlowski
Introduction
The WHO defines oral health as the state of the mouth, teeth and orofacial structures that enables
individuals to perform essential functions, such as eating, breathing and speaking, and encompasses
psychosocial dimensions, such as self-confidence, well-being and the ability to socialize and work
without pain, discomfort and embarrassment. Oral health varies over the life course from early life to
old age, is integral to general health and supports individuals in participating in society and achieving
their potential (1).
Untreated oral diseases affect almost half of the world’s population. Global case numbers have increased
by 1 billion over the last 30 years – a clear indication that many people do not have access to appropriate
oral health care, which includes prevention, risk protection and restorative and rehabilitative services.
The consequences of untreated oral diseases – including physical symptoms, functional limitations
and detrimental impacts on emotional, mental and social well-being – are severe and debilitating. For
those able to obtain treatment, the costs are often high and can lead to significant economic burden.
Oral health plays a major role in well-being and self-esteem, while oral diseases heavily affect quality of
life, productivity and ability to work as well as social participation.
Stark and persistent socioeconomic inequalities in oral diseases exist with a higher disease burden found
in disadvantaged and marginalized population groups. At the same time, public and private expenditures
for oral health care are reaching almost US$ 390 billion globally, with a very unequal distribution among
regions and countries. Despite these challenges, oral diseases are largely preventable with population-
based public health measures.
Concerned about the lack of attention to oral diseases, the World Health Assembly adopted in May
2021 a historic resolution (WHA74.5) recognizing that oral health should be firmly embedded within the
noncommunicable disease (NCD) agenda and that oral health care interventions should be included in
universal health coverage (UHC) programmes (2). The World Health Assembly delegates asked WHO to
develop a draft global strategy for tackling oral diseases that was adopted during the seventy-fifth session
of the WHA in May 2022,to develop by 2023 an action plan including a monitoring framework for tracking
progress with clear measurable targets to be achieved by 2030; to develop “best buy” interventions
on oral health; and to explore the inclusion of noma in the road map for neglected tropical diseases
2021–2030. This WHO Global oral health status report is part of WHO’s series of data reports and is an
important milestone in the larger process of mobilizing political action and resources for oral health.
1
The report has three broad aims:
1. outline the global public health importance and impact of oral diseases over the life course;
2. contribute to the process of implementing the World Health Assembly 74.5 resolution on oral health at
global, regional and country levels by providing baseline information; and
3. encourage commitment and action from governments, United Nations (UN) organizations and nonstate
actors such as nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), academic institutions, philanthropic foundations,
private-sector entities and other stakeholders to address oral diseases in the context of global health agendas.
To achieve these aims, the report will:
• highlight the global burden of oral disease and inequalities using the latest available data from the Global
Burden of Disease (GBD) project and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC);
• emphasize social and commercial determinants and common risk factors that oral diseases and other
NCDs share as a foundation for concerted action;
• highlight challenges and opportunities for oral health within the wider global health context requiring
engagement of stakeholders to accelerate progress towards universal coverage for oral health; and
• provide country oral health profiles based on key health and oral health indicators for monitoring and
evaluation covering all WHO Member States.
The report is not a textbook on oral health and disease and does not aim to cover all topics comprehensively.
Instead, the report reviews the most recent global data on major oral diseases and comes to a clear
conclusion: the status of global oral health is alarming and requires urgent action by all stakeholders on
global, regional, national and local levels. The target audiences are policy leaders and decision-makers;
planners and managers in health, public health and oral health at different levels; oral health stakeholders,
such as oral health professionals, academics and researchers; and other nonstate actors, populations,
communities and anyone affected by or interested in oral diseases. Moreover, the report is not a guidance
document proposing concise policy recommendations but rather is intended to provide fundamental
data and a basis to initiate discussion and generate commitment towards changing the current situation
of neglect. As such, the report is part of a set of tools and processes in the wider context of strengthening
oral health awareness and action, together with the 2021 World Health Assembly resolution on oral health
(WHA74.5), the WHO Global Strategy on Oral Health (WHA75/10 Add. 1) and others.
Section 1 of the report highlights oral diseases as largely preventable global public health problems, focusing
on their combined burden, shared risk factors and determinants as well as their impacts on individuals,
populations, health systems and economies globally.
Section 2 details the latest data on burden and trends for the five main oral diseases and conditions –
untreated caries of deciduous and permanent teeth, severe periodontal disease, edentulism and cancer
of the lip and oral cavity – as well as other conditions of public health relevance.
Section 3 analyses some of the key challenges and opportunities related to health systems: challenges
for the oral health workforce, challenges related to oral health information and persisting issues of public
health relevance, including a renewed focus on primary oral health care.
2
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
Section 4 situates the report as part of a global process towards improving oral health and connects oral
health improvement to general development and progress towards agreed-upon international goals.
The report is complemented by country oral health profiles with key health and oral health information for
each WHO Member State. It will be made available as a separate online resource. Information on the data
sources used, indicator definitions and the details of references used are also provided.
The report presents the latest available data and information using different sources with the best possible
global coverage. However, limitations of oral health data and information must be acknowledged and
emphasized. For many aspects of oral epidemiology, surveillance, health system analysis, economic data
and others, the scope and depth of information available are neither as comprehensive nor as reliable as
for other NCDs. This is largely because of inadequate attention to and awareness of oral diseases combined
with a lack of resources, guiding policies and health system investments as well as insufficient political
prioritization. Despite these limitations, many aspects highlighted in the report will be new and previously
unknown to many readers.
It is equally important that the report uses metrics and data that align with global health metrics (such as
disability-adjusted life years) rather than specific oral health indicators that require specialist knowledge
to be understood. Oral health specialists may miss such indicators in the report’s text, yet integration will
be greatly facilitated when using a unified global public health language to describe burden and challenges.
As a status report, this document is part of WHO’s series of data reports and hence presents a snapshot
of the current situation (editorial closure March 2022). Some of the information presented will be useful
in the context of the future monitoring framework aiming to track the implementation of the Global Oral
Health Action Plan (2023-2030). By highlighting data and information gaps, the report may also serve as
an incentive to strengthen and improve surveillance and information systems for oral health, one of the
strategic objectives of the WHO Global Strategy on Oral Health.
©WHO/Malin Bring
3
Introduction
©Julie Pudlowski
Oral diseases
are global public
health problems
1
Oral diseases are a major public health problem for countries and populations worldwide, although they
often are not publicly recognized as such. Globally, these diseases affect almost 3.5 billion people, with
three out of four people affected living in middle-income countries. Oral diseases are a group of distinct
disease entities with their own aetiology and burden as well as different options for prevention, care
and rehabilitation. The oral diseases and conditions (herein referred to collectively as oral diseases)
representing the highest burdens include untreated caries of deciduous (primary) and permanent teeth,
severe periodontal disease, edentulism (total tooth loss) and cancer of the lip and oral cavity.
Each of these diseases is a significant public health problem on a global, regional and national level,
compromising the health of individuals and populations. With their unparalleled burden, stark inequalities
and risk factors shared with other NCDs, oral diseases have a major impact on health, well-being, health
care systems and economies, adding to the increasing burden of NCDs. Most oral diseases are preventable
through self-care or with simple, evidence-based and cost-effective population-wide measures including
action on the wider social, economic and political determinants of health, making it possible to reduce
the disease burden significantly and limit negative impacts.
This section highlights the combined challenges from the main oral diseases. The specific global burden,
key features and risk factors of each of the five major oral diseases as well as selected other diseases and
conditions of public health relevance are further detailed in Section 2 of this report.
Box 1. Oral diseases – a large group of diseases and conditions
Apart from the five main diseases (caries of
deciduous and permanent teeth, severe periodontal
disease, edentulism and lip and oral cavity cancer),
many other diseases and conditions are relevant
for oral health. These include oral manifestations
of systemic diseases (metabolic, allergic and
immunologic diseases, including HIV infection);
oral mucosa diseases; erosion and tooth wear; oral
impacts of substance abuse; noma; congenital
malformations of teeth and the enamel; viral, fungal
and bacterial infections; trauma (including physical
and chemical injuries) of the teeth, jawbones and
adjacent maxillofacial structures; cysts and tumours
of odontogenic origin; salivary gland diseases; and
disturbances in the development and growth of oral
structures (3). These diseases and conditions are not
comprehensively covered in the global estimations
of disease burden from the Institute of Health Metrics
and Evaluation (IHME) GBD project (4). This report
relies on the latest available GBD data from 2019. The
latest available cancer data from 2020 were provided
by the IARC (5).
6
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
Box 2. Data sources for the burden of oral diseases and other information
This report uses the latest available data from
sources with a wide coverage of countries. Data on
caries (deciduous and permanent teeth), severe
periodontal disease and edentulism are provided by
the IHME GBD Model for Oral Disorders (4). The Model
reports estimated disease burden (prevalence, case
numbers and other metrics) for all WHO Member
States based on rigorously selected data from 130
countries. As of the time of this report’s publication,
the GBD Model provided data for 1990–2019 – the
most comprehensive dataset on the burden of oral
diseases using the standard GBD metrics. Other
databases available using different metrics more
specific to oral health, such as the decayed, missing
and filled teeth (DMFT) index, the Community
Periodontal Index (CPI) and others, are not regularly
updated and do not provide comparable coverage
of countries. The GBD Model calculates estimations
for all 194 WHO Member States using a complex
modelling approach. For a detailed description of
the methodology see Kassebaum et al. 2017 and GBD
2017 Oral Disorders Collaborators 2020 (4, 6).
The IARC, a specialized WHO organization, provided
the data on lip and oral cavity cancer using their
latest available dataset from the Global Cancer
Observatory (2020) (5). Their estimations of
incidence, case numbers and other metrics for all
cancers, including lip and oral cavity cancer, are the
most comprehensive and are widely used.
Data and other information extracted from relevant
scientific publications and databases are referenced
where used, complementing the two main data
sources. Specific challenges to surveillance and
data analysis for oral health decision-making are
described in Section 3.4.
1.1 Oral diseases:
an increasing global burden
About 3.5 billion people worldwide were affected by
oral diseases in 2019, making them the most widespread
conditions among the more than 300 diseases and
conditions that affect humanity (4). Oral diseases have
remained the most dominant conditions globally since
1990, the first year of oral disease data available from
the GBD dataset (see Fig. 1). Among the major oral
diseases, untreated caries of permanent teeth is the
most prevalent with around 2 billion cases, severe
periodontal disease follows with around 1 billion cases,
then untreated caries of deciduous teeth with about 510
million cases and edentulism with 350 million cases (all
in 2019). The combined estimated number of cases of
oral diseases globally is about 1 billion higher than cases
of all five main NCDs (mental disorders, cardiovascular
disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory diseases
and cancers) combined (see Fig. 2) (4).
©Julie Pudlowski
7
1.Oral diseases are global public health problems
Fig. 1 Ranking of most prevalent conditions per WB country income level
Note. Data are for all ages and both sexes from GBD 2019 (4).
8
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
Fig. 2 Comparison of estimated global case numbers for selected NCDs
Note. Data are for all ages and both sexes from GBD 2019; oral diseases do not include lip and oral cavity cancer (4). A standard method has been
applied to incorporate the latest UN population estimates.
Three quarters of people affected by oral diseases live in lower- and upper-middle income countries,
followed by 16% in high-income countries and 9% in low-income countries. Oral diseases have a high
global average prevalence of 45%, which is very similar across World Bank (WB) country income groups
and WHO regions (see Figs. 3 and 4). Both the South-East Asia Region and Western Pacific Region have
the highest case numbers among the WHO regions as they include countries with large population sizes.
The other four WHO regions have similar yet still high case numbers (see Fig. 4). This share of disease
burden among countries is also mirrored in the respective proportions of disability-adjusted life years
(DALYs) for oral conditions combined.
Fig. 3 Estimated case numbers and prevalence of the major oral diseases combined per WB country income
group (excluding lip/oral cavity cancer)
Note. Data are from GBD 2019 (4).
9
1.Oral diseases are global public health problems
Fig. 4 Estimated case numbers and prevalence of the major oral diseases combined per WHO region
(excluding lip/oral cavity cancer)
Note. Data are from GBD 2019 (4).
Between 1990 and 2019, estimated case numbers of oral diseases grew by more than 1 billion – a 50%
increase, higher than the population increase of about 45% during the same period (see Figs. 5 and 6) (7).
During the same period, case numbers in low-income countries more than doubled (114%), and they
increased by 70% in lower-middle income countries and by 33% and 23% in upper-middle and high-
income countries, respectively, outpacing the demographic growth in those countries. Similar trends
are observed for DALYs resulting from oral diseases, with a global average increase of 75% (see Table 1).
The highest increase was observed in low-income countries (123%), followed by lower-middle income
countries (98%), upper-middle income countries (78%) and high-income countries (37%). Details and
challenges of the DALY concept in the context of oral diseases are highlighted in Box 3.
©WHO/Tom Vierus
10
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
Table 1. Percentage change in estimated prevalence, case numbers and DALYs of the major oral diseases (except
lip and oral cavity cancer) and change in population by WB country income group
WB
country
income
group
Percentage
change in
prevalence rates
(1990–2019)
Percentage
change in
case numbers
(1990–2019)
Percentage
change in
DALYs
(1990–2019)
Percentage
change in
population
(1990–2019)
Low income
0.1%
114.0%
123.0%
118.0%
Lower-middle
income
2.6%
70.0%
98.3%
63.2%
Upper-middle
income
5.4%
33.0%
78.1%
28.0%
High income
2.2%
22.7%
37.0%
20.6%
Global
3.2%
49.3%
75.0%
44.8%
Note. Data are from GBD 1990–2019 and UN DESA 2019 (4, 7).
Fig. 5 Estimated case numbers of the major oral diseases combined between 1990 and 2019 per WB country
income group (excluding lip/oral cavity cancer)
Note. Data are from GBD 2019 (4).
11
1.Oral diseases are global public health problems
Fig. 6 Estimated population change between 1990 and 2019 by WB country income group
Note. Data are from UN DESA 2019 (7).
Box 3. Understanding and interpreting the oral disease burden
Understanding and interpreting the burden of oral
disease can be challenging. Using different indicators
and metrics can lead to different conclusions and
narratives, particularly for dental caries.
The GBD model used in this report provides data on
prevalence, case numbers and DALYs for oral diseases.
When considering changes of the time, these indicators
are best interpreted together with demographic
information. Table 1 therefore lists the percentage
changes between 1990 and 2019 of estimated prevalence
rates, case numbers and DALYs of the major oral diseases
together with percentage changes in population.
Selected tables in Section 2 also include information
on changes in population size. Data provided may differ
from published GBD data because a standard method
has been applied to incorporate the latest UN population
estimates instead of GBD population estimates.
The global population grew by 45% between 1990
and 2019 (7). At the same time, the estimated age-
standardized global prevalence of oral diseases
increased by 3.2%, resulting in a 50% increase in
estimated case numbers, which represents about 1
billion additional cases (see Figs. 5 and 6) (4).
The quite similar prevalence rates of oral diseases
across country income level groups or WHO regions (see
Figs. 3 and 4) may be surprising, given that population
and health system profiles across countries vary
markedly. A possible reason lies in the definition of
“case” and “prevalence” used by the GBD model, which
focuses only on the presence or absence of a disease
and does not consider its severity.
Estimated DALYs increased by 75%, likely reflecting a
disproportionate increase in cases of severe periodontal
disease, which has higher DALYs than dental caries,
although caries still has the highest case numbers of all
oral diseases. Fig. 7 shows estimated DALYs for selected
NCDs, highlighting the comparably low number of DALYs
for oral diseases despite their high case numbers and
prevalence. WHO and IHME are planning a review of the
methodology for calculating DALYs for oral conditions to
reflect their burden in a more realistic way (see also Box
4 on DALYs).
12
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
Fig. 7 Comparison of estimated global DALYs for selected NCDs
Note. Data are for all ages and both sexes from GBD 2019, oral diseases do not include lip and oral cavity cancer (4, 7). A standard method has been
applied to incorporate the latest UN population estimates.
Traditional oral health measurements, such as the frequently used DMFT index or the CPI, document
aspects of disease severity, usually for specific age groups. In the absence of comprehensive, comparable
data with global coverage, this report uses only the metrics of the GBD model (see also Boxes 1 and 2).
The dramatic increases in global case numbers since 1990 present a huge burden to health systems. It
appears that measures to prevent and control oral diseases have not been successful. The result is an
all-time high in case numbers, representing billions of people with unmet needs across all countries.
This challenges health care systems everywhere, but particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
©WHO/ Yoshi Shimizu
13
1.Oral diseases are global public health problems
Box 4. What is a disability-adjusted life year?
The DALY was developed in the context of the GBD
project to provide a summary measure of population
morbidity and account for mortality and nonfatal
health consequences. DALY is the unit of analysis for
measuring the relative magnitude of losses of healthy
life associated with different causes of disease and
injury (8, 9).
One DALY represents the loss of the equivalent of
one year of full health. DALYs accumulate when
individuals die prematurely or when they live with
the health consequences of chronic diseases, injuries
or risk factors. For a particular cause of disease or
injury, DALYs are computed as the sum of years of life
lost (YLLs), which capture premature mortality and
health losses, and years lived with disability (YLDs),
which capture lost healthy life due to living in states
worse than perfect health (8, 9).
Applying the DALY concept to oral diseases allows
for comparison with other disease groups. However,
the approach also has limitations: the methodology
emphasizes diseases with high mortality, which is
not the case for the most prevalent oral diseases.
Despite high case numbers and global prevalence,
DALY values for oral diseases (except lip and oral
cavity cancer) are comparatively low. Moreover,
the underlying epidemiologic data sources for
oral diseases are often incomplete and not recent,
requiring advanced estimation techniques with
considerable uncertainties. WHO and IHME are
planning to review the methodology for calculating
DALYs for oral conditions to reflect their burden in a
more accurate way.
Birth
Early
death
Expected
life years
YLL
YLD
Healthy
life
DALY
Disability Adjusted Life Year
is a measure of overall disease burden,
expressed as the cumulative number of years
lost due to ill-health, disability or early death
=
YLD
Years
lived with
disability
YLL
Years
of life
lost
+
Source: Adapted from Public Health England, 2015.
14
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
1.2 Common determinants and risk factors of oral diseases
Oral diseases share determinants and risk factors with other NCDs. The WHO Commission on Social
Determinants of Health drew attention to the importance of the wider socioeconomic, political and
environmental drivers of health: the circumstances in which people are born, grow, live, work and age
(10). These circumstances largely determine the behaviours that people adopt and the opportunities
and choices available to them. This framework has been modified to incorporate the underlying causes
of oral diseases, the shared risk factors between oral conditions and other NCDs, and the commercial
determinants of oral health (11, 12).
1.2.1 Social and political determinants of oral health
The underlying causes of oral health inequalities are often complex and related to country-specific historical,
economic, cultural, social or political factors. The conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work
and age and the structural drivers of those conditions – the inequitable distribution of power, money and
resources in society – are the underlying social determinants of oral health inequalities (13–15). More recently,
aspects of discrimination among racial and ethnic groups or indigenous minority populations have gained
attention as symptoms of inequality in power and agency influencing health and oral health (16, 17). The
conditions and choices available to individuals and their families are therefore largely determined by their
social circumstances – the conditions of daily life (Fig. 8; modified from Peres et al, 2019) (88).
Fig. 8 Social and commercial determinants of oral diseases
15
1.Oral diseases are global public health problems
1.2.2 Commercial determinants of oral health
Commercial determinants of health are the corporate-sector activities that affect people’s health positively
or negatively. Corporations, often with transnational or global reach, are promoting products that are
detrimental to population health, particularly in the areas of NCDs and oral health. The global tobacco
and alcohol industries are prime examples that increasingly target emerging economies in low- and
middle-income countries or particularly vulnerable population groups (18, 19).
Global food and drinks industries, including those producing foods high in sugar and sugar-sweetened
beverages (SSBs), use similar strategies and are lobbying governments and public opinion to delay,
modify or hinder public policies that protect public health, such as controls on advertising to children,
the introduction of health taxes, or limiting the retail size of SSBs. These industries are also keen on
engaging with public health, education and other sectors to give themselves a socially responsible image
including for example sponsorship of school activities and sporting events. Some are also engaging with
health and oral health research and professional organizations, thereby potentially biasing science and
public communication. With sophisticated marketing, promotion and sales approaches these industries
seek to influence consumer behaviour and create an environment where their products are universally
available, affordable, accessible and appealing – a powerful and potent threat to population oral health.
The role of sugar consumption, tobacco use and alcohol use as risk factors of oral disease render oral
health sector particularly susceptible to such detrimental commercial influences (20, 21).
The role and impact of global and local corporations related to unhealthy commodities should be
distinguished from those that are related to the production and marketing of products for personal
oral hygiene and self-care. The widespread commercial promotion of fluoride toothpaste and other
personal oral hygiene products has an overall positive impact on oral health by expanding access to
and daily use of these products, even though pricing and other factors also contribute to inequalities
in affordability. When the complex product portfolio of large holding companies or global corporations
includes products with positive and negative health benefits, public-private cooperation and support
becomes challenging.
1.2.3 The common risk factor approach
The common risk factor approach recognizes that noncommunicable diseases and conditions, including
oral diseases, share a set of key modifiable risk factors (11). For example, tobacco use is a major risk factor
for a range of conditions, such as cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases and many cancers, but
also for severe periodontal disease and lip and oral cavity cancer. The common risk factor approach is
the basis for linking action on oral disease prevention with the wider NCD agenda. This can be seen most
notably in relation to the integrated action on improving poor diets, tackling tobacco use and reducing
harmful alcohol consumption.
16
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
Fig. 9 Common risk factors for NCDs and oral health
diseases
risk factors
Oral
diseases
Cardiovascular
diseases
Cancers
Diabetes
Chronic
respiratory
diseases
Mental and
neurological
conditions
All forms of
tobacco use
Environmental
pollution
Physical
inactivity
Harmful
alcohol use
Unhealthy
diets
1.2.4 Common risk factors of public health importance
High sugar intake, all forms of tobacco and harmful alcohol use are major public health challenges for
a wide range of NCDs. They are also the key modifiable risk factors for oral diseases (more specific risk
factor aspects for selected oral diseases are addressed in Section 2).
Sugar consumption is the main cause of dental caries, showing a clear dose–effect relationship. The
evidence for the role of sugar in the aetiology of dental caries played a crucial role in the WHO Sugars
Guideline recommending less than 10% of daily total energy intake from free sugars as well as the
conditional recommendation to reduce intake even further to 5% of total energy (22, 23). The consumption
of free sugars, defined as “all monosaccharides and disaccharides added to foods and beverages by the
manufacturer, cook or consumer, and sugars naturally present in honey, syrups, fruit juices and fruit
juice concentrates” is increasingly recognized as a public health concern (24). Sugar is cheap and almost
universally available across the globe. In high- and middle-income countries, sugar consumption far
exceeds WHO recommendations, and in many low-income countries, consumption is steadily rising.
More recently, the very high level of free sugars found in commercial foods for infants and young children
has become a cause for concern, resulting in the promulgation of numerous guidelines from WHO (21).
Despite overall reductions, 22.3% of the global population were estimated to use some forms of tobacco
(2020). Among populations aged 15 years and older, the proportion of men using tobacco amounted
to 36.7% while that of women equaled to 7.8%. The prevalence rate of current tobacco use for males
was more than four times the rate for females. The age-specific rates peak at age group 45–54 for men
17
1.Oral diseases are global public health problems
and 55–64 for women (25). Cancers, heart disease, stroke, chronic lung diseases and many other NCDs,
including oral diseases, are caused by tobacco use. The burden of tobacco use disproportionally falls on
the poor and disadvantaged and is therefore a major cause of health inequality. All forms of tobacco use
are major risk factors for lip and oral cavity cancer (see Section 2.4) (26). More than 350 million people
globally are estimated to use smokeless tobacco, a cultural habit that is particularly popular in South
Asia and some Pacific Island countries (27). Tobacco use remains one of the leading global causes of
preventable deaths and is associated with more than 8 million death in 2019 (28).
An estimated 1.3 billion people aged over 15 years consume alcohol at harmful levels (above non-drinker
equivalence, 2020), with the highest rates found across Europe, the Americas and the Western Pacific
region (29, 30). In 2019, total alcohol per capita consumption was 5.8 litres of pure alcohol, with higher
consumption among men with 9.2 compared to women with 2.5 litres (31). The harmful use of alcohol
is a causal factor in more than 200 disease and injury conditions, including injuries, digestive diseases,
cardiovascular diseases and many other NCDs as well as oral diseases, mainly lip and oral cavity cancer
(see Section 2.4) (32). Moreover, harmful alcohol consumption is associated with a variety of family, social,
and economic problems and mental and behavioural disorders. Globally, the harmful use of alcohol
causes an estimated 3 million deaths per year, representing 5.3% of all deaths. Of the global burden of
disease and injury, 5.1% is attributable to alcohol, as measured in DALYs.
©Julie Pudlowski
©WHO/ Yoshi Shimizu
18
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
1.3 Individual and population impacts of oral diseases along the life course
Oral diseases affect individuals and populations across the entire life course (see Fig. 10) (33, 34). The
main oral diseases impair different age groups in specific ways (6). Deciduous teeth are prone to caries
as soon as they erupt, with a peak of prevalence around the age of 6. Similarly, prevalence of caries in
permanent teeth typically shows steep increases after eruption and reaches the highest levels in late
adolescence and early adulthood before remaining stable for the rest of the lifetime. Severe periodontal
disease is a disease of middle age, reaching highest prevalence rates around 60 years. Edentulism (total
tooth loss) steadily increases with a peak in older age groups.
Fig. 10 Prevalence rates of four major oral diseases over the life course
Note. Data are from GBD 2019 (4).
All oral diseases are chronic, progressive and cumulative in nature. Toothache, which accompanies
many of the major oral diseases, is a common individual experience and is consistently rated among
the most intense of pains. Combined with a high prevalence, impacts from oral diseases are often
experienced on a repeated basis, resulting in physical, social and mental consequences. This includes
impacts on self-confidence and self-esteem, often leading to reduced social interaction, isolation or
even stigmatization. Severe untreated oral diseases may negatively affect employment opportunities
and reduce productivity (see Fig.11).
19
1.Oral diseases are global public health problems
Negative impacts from untreated caries are common among children and adolescents, frequently causing
acute infection, dental pain and discomfort (35). Untreated caries affect a child’s ability to eat, speak,
learn and sleep. Severe untreated caries in children affect nutrition, growth and weight gain. Toothache
can also affect school attendance, leading to poorer educational performance (36, 37). In many high-
income countries, the extraction of carious teeth under general anaesthesia is the main reason for
hospitalization of young children. All of these negative impacts of oral diseases disproportionally affect
people from more disadvantaged backgrounds (38).
Case study 1.
Promoting oral health as essential
to healthy ageing (Japan)
In 1987, a survey in Japan found that people at age 80
had only about five natural teeth on average, causing
malnutrition and poor health in the elderly. Two years
later, based on new data on oral functionality, Japan’s
Ministry of Health and Welfare and Japan Dental
Association launched the 8020 Campaign (39). The goal
was to ensure that people still had 20 of their teeth at
age of 80 so that they could maintain nutritional and
social well-being. The campaign adopted a lifelong
approach to preventing tooth loss by engaging
multiple sectors and carrying out initiatives that
targeted all generations.
At 93 years old, Sakuji Yanadori from Niigata City,
Japan, still has 30 natural teeth, dispelling the myth
that “losing teeth is a normal part of getting older.” His
explanation for his healthy mouth does not reveal any
secrets. He practices good oral hygiene, does not miss
his regular dental visits and avoids sugar.
Maintaining natural teeth with adequate functionality
allows Yanadori to enjoy well-balanced meals that he
shares with his family. His diet consists of a variety
of meat, fish and vegetables that helps him keep his
body in optimum condition, allowing him to remain
socially connected as well. Today, Yanadori can still
be found playing piano or the game Go at the local
community club.
A national survey in 2016 showed that the 8020
Campaign had been successful in reaching its goals,
with half of the 80-year-old population maintaining
more than 20 of their natural teeth. The campaign
continues to adopt a holistic approach to oral
health, ensuring that the future elderly population
has sufficient teeth and oral function to maintain
good health and quality of life (40).
Poor oral health among older people can negatively affect daily activities and thereby contribute to
overall frailty. Oral diseases result in specific challenges related to pain, impaired chewing and eating
ability, or even nutritional deficiencies. Frail older people living in long-term care facilities often have
especially high oral health needs that may complicate existing comorbidities. As longevity increases,
©Hiroshi Ogawa
20
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
quality of life matters even more, and oral health is among the major health aspects related to improved
quality of life (41, 42). It is therefore important for oral health care services and professionals to provide
appropriate services for the needs of older populations. The UN declared the “Decade of Healthy Ageing
(2021–2030).” The accompanying action plan recognizes that oral health is a key indicator of overall
health in older age (43).
Fig. 11 Selected impacts of oral diseases
Impact on educational
attainment
Impact on aesthetics/
reduced self esteem
Social isolation
Pain and discomfort
Fear / anxiety
Time off work/school
to attend clinics
Reduced productivity
of the workforce
Impact on general
health
Impaired growth
in children
Functional
limitations
Treatment costs
(societal and individual)
Sleepless nights
1.3.1 Relation between oral health and general health
Oral health is integral part of general health, sharing common causal pathways and affecting each other
in a bi-directional fashion. In recent decades, many studies have assessed the potential link between
poor oral health and a range of chronic diseases (44). The strongest and most consistent evidence has
shown an association between severe periodontal disease and diabetes mellitus; clinical interventions
to treat severe periodontal disease have shown improvements in diabetes status (45, 46). Evidence also
exists of an association between severe periodontal disease and cardiovascular disease and, to a lesser
extent, cerebrovascular disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (47–49). In addition to severe
periodontal disease, associations have been found of caries and tooth loss with other conditions such
as cognitive decline, certain cancers and pneumonia. These associations are underpinned by shared
biological (infection, inflammation, microbiome and immune responses), behavioural and wider social
risk factors. It is important, however, to recognize that the nature of associations between poor oral
health and other chronic diseases is not necessarily causal and is often weak compared to other key
risk factors. More high-quality research is needed to understand fully the potential shared pathways
between oral diseases, poor oral health and other general diseases and conditions, the coexistence of
multiple health conditions, as well as the impact of oral health interventions on general health (50).
21
1.Oral diseases are global public health problems
1.4 Global inequalities in the burden of oral diseases
The burden of oral diseases is not uniformly distributed across populations. Instead, all oral diseases
are socially patterned and show strong social gradients, disproportionally affecting the most vulnerable
and disadvantaged population groups within and across societies, and over the life course. People
who are on low incomes, people living with disabilities, older people living alone or in care homes,
people who are refugees, in prison or living in remote and rural communities, children and people
from minority and/or other socially marginalized groups generally carry a higher burden, similar to
other NCDs. These differences in oral health status are not inevitable and do not occur by chance;
inequities are caused by a complex array of interconnecting factors, many of which are largely beyond
individuals’ direct control.
Oral health inequalities are defined as differences in oral health status that are avoidable and deemed
to be unfair, unacceptable and unjust. Addressing oral health inequalities is a matter of social justice,
ethical public health policy and professional practice.
Different types of oral health inequalities exist. It is important to distinguish inequalities in oral health
status from inequalities in access and use of oral health services. Both aspects are important but are
caused by different factors and therefore require different policy solutions.
Many studies from high-, middle- and low-income countries have shown the direct and proportional
association between different measures of socioeconomic status (income, education and social class)
and the prevalence and severity of oral diseases across the life course, from early childhood to older
age. The association between socioeconomic status and oral diseases is not limited to the differences
between the rich and the poor in society. As is the case with most chronic diseases, oral diseases are
socially patterned across the entire social spectrum in a consistent stepwise fashion – the social gradient
in oral health. This has important policy implications because a traditional approach of targeting only
high-risk groups fails to address the social gradient in oral health.
Inequalities in oral health status also exist across different population groups. Across the life course,
oral diseases and conditions disproportionally affect the poor and vulnerable members of societies,
often including those who are on low incomes, people living with disabilities, older people living alone
or in care homes, people who are refugees, in prison or living in remote and rural communities, and
people from minority and/or other socially marginalized groups.
The burden of severe tooth loss and edentulism provides a stark example of significant inequalities in
oral health status (see Fig. 12) (51–53). Those with lower socioeconomic status, with lower education
levels or who are affected by other disadvantages have on average fewer teeth than population
groups with higher socioeconomic and educational indicators. The resulting impacts on speaking,
eating, social interaction and self-esteem can be significant and further contribute to disadvantage
and inequality. The negative aesthetic and social impacts of visibly missing teeth greatly reduce
prospects of finding a job (54).
22
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
Fig. 12 Comparison of edentulism by educational attainment in different populations (in percentage of
edentulous population)
Note. Data for Australia, Canada, Chile, New Zealand and the United States are for adults aged 25+ years; education categories: lowest, secondary,
postsecondary and university (from Elani et al., 2017). Data for Colombia are for adults aged 45+ years; education categories: primary or less,
secondary, technical and university (from Guarnizo-Herreño et al., 2018) (51, 52).
1.5 Inequalities in access to oral health services
Access to oral health services is highly variable both within and among
countries. Oral health care is largely a demand-led service rather
than the result of a rigorous planning process and therefore can be
poorly aligned with the oral health needs of the local population. In
many situations, the classic inverse care law applies: provision of oral
health services is inversely related to the oral health needs of the
population (57). Across the world, oral health care is predominantly
provided by private practitioners. Both, private and public oral
health care services, often only cover a small proportion of the
population (see Section 3.1). Inequalities in dental attendance also
exist throughout the life course (58). In high- and middle-income
countries, oral health services are often poorly distributed or
inaccessible to vulnerable or disadvantaged groups in society. In
stark contrast, there is often an overconcentration of oral health
services in affluent urban neighbourhoods where disease levels
are generally lower than in poorer, underserved areas. In many low-
income countries, the situation is far worse. In these settings, oral
health professionals tend to be concentrated largely in urban areas,
inaccessible to much of the population who live in rural locations.
In these circumstances, people often spend considerable time and
cost for travel to seek professional oral health care (12).
©Julie Pudlowski
23
1.Oral diseases are global public health problems
Philippe Aubert, 42 years old from France, lives
with athetotic cerebral palsy (CP). This condition,
characterized by involuntary movements, is
present from birth and affects muscle function. The
uncontrolled movements prevent Aubert from walking,
talking or using his arms.
“Due to pronounced bruxism (habitual teeth grinding),
I had almost ground down all my teeth. I had serious
difficulties in chewing and eating,” Aubert explains,
referring to his dental problems caused by the
symptoms of cerebral palsy (55). “My teeth were
a real problem for a long time, considering all the
difficulties I went through to get them treated.” Aubert
explains that dental appointments had been very
challenging since childhood because medical staff had
little knowledge of his special needs and the dental
equipment and settings were inappropriate.
“I can testify that, as far as the experience of disabled
people in dental offices is concerned, many simple
details including the texture of the seats, transfer to
the dental chair, the light, the noise of the dental drill,
and even the typical smell of a dental clinic could easily
trigger spasticity, anxiety or other symptoms for a
patient with CP,” Aubert says.
Some experiences during Aubert’s dental visits made
him feel unsafe and more reluctant to go to another
appointment. “Once I almost choked on a dental x-ray
film that was put in my mouth and nearly destroyed
the dental chair on which I was being examined,
because of the involuntary movements triggered by
the procedure,” he explains.
Aubert strongly believes that the most important
aspect of successful treatment of people with special
needs is the attitude and skill of the health care team.
“Lack of knowledge and training of medical and dental
personnel regarding different types of disabilities
needs to be addressed,” he says, highlighting the
need for organized and effective training of medical
personnel.
Case study 2.
The challenge of oral health care for people living
with disabilities (France)
“I am well aware of the practical challenges of listening
to the individual needs of disabled patients, but a
reliable and respectful relationship is required for the
care of these patients and can only be established by
taking time to hear them out and understand their
needs,” says Aubert, calling for a caring approach to
build a trusting relationship with each patient.
After years of hospital visits, which usually ended in
tooth extraction, Aubert found help through a non-
profit organization, Handident (https://www.handident.
com/), where he was warmly welcomed and treated for
his dental problems. “I had to go to the extreme of full
mouth rehabilitation so that I could claim, and finally
appreciate, my mouth and teeth,” Aubert says with
gratitude to the dentists who treated him with kindness.
He refers to them as the people who changed his life.
After publishing his book Rage to exist, Aubert became a
public figure with a mission to highlight the experience
of people with disabilities (56). His words are “spoken”
via a speech synthesizer that is controlled by his gaze,
but his emotions are clearly conveyed by his smile.
“I have not spoken since birth! My mouth and teeth
helped me to eat, not to communicate. Today, my mouth
plays an essential role in my communication and my
aesthetic,” says Aubert referring to his bright smile as a
real asset that has become part of his identity.
©Philippe Aubert
24
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
In February 2007, 12-year-old Deamonte Driver died
in Maryland after complications from an avoidable
dental infection. “Twelve-year-old Deamonte Driver
died of a toothache Sunday. A routine, $80 tooth
extraction might have saved him. If his mother had
been insured. If his family had not lost its Medicaid.
If Medicaid dentists weren’t so hard to find. If his
mother hadn’t been focused on getting a dentist for
his brother, who had six rotted teeth,” wrote Mary
Otto on the Metro page of the Washington Post on
28 February 2007 (59).
Deamonte’s death brought to light the long-standing
issue of access to oral health care for Maryland’s
poor children. Reports at that time showed that 71%
of children on Medicaid in Maryland (ages 0–20) had
received no dental services during the previous year,
and more than 11 000 of these children had not seen
a dentist in 4 years. As a result, more than 30% of
Maryland’s elementary school children had untreated
caries. Because of poor Medicaid reimbursement
rates, only 12% of Maryland dentists were full
participants in the program.
Otto’s article in the Washington Post sparked global
media attention, which then led to a collaboration
among oral health advocates, civil society
organizations, policy-makers and legislators to
prioritize the oral health agenda.
“The oral health reforms first is about a tragedy
of a child that rants and improvements to oral
health surveillance and infrastructure statewide.
As a result of numerous oral health policy reforms
and initiatives, utilization rates of oral health care
increased as did the number of dentists participating
in the state Medicaid programme, making Maryland a
role model for other states (60).
Case study 3.
Reforming access to oral health care to address
disparities (United States)
“The story of Deamonte Driver continues to be
told, not just in Maryland but around the country.
It has become part of an ongoing movement to
improve access to oral health services to Americans
of all ages who might otherwise go without care,”
Otto says. She highlights the difficulties that
economically disadvantaged people are facing and
the need to integrate oral health into overall health
care in her book Teeth (2017) (61).
Since Deamonte’s death, access to dental services for
all has been identified as an important component of
comprehensive health care for children. In 2009, the
reauthorization of the Children’s Health Insurance
Program (CHIP) required states to provide dental
coverage to enrolled children and gave states the
option to provide dental benefits to certain children
who did not qualify for full CHIP coverage. In 2010,
the health reform bill known as the Affordable Care
Act required that starting in 2014, all insurance
plans to be offered through new health insurance
exchanges had to include oral health care for children
and prohibited insurers from charging out-of-pocket
expenses for preventive paediatric oral health
services (62).
© WHO/Johannah Jorgensen
25
1.Oral diseases are global public health problems
1.6 Global expenditures and economic impact of oral diseases
Expenditures for oral health care are highly unequal globally as well as across regions and countries. With
a generally high burden of untreated oral disease for all populations and countries, the differences in
spending indicate great differences in availability of and priority for oral health care. However, the level
of national expenditures is not necessarily correlated to better or worse oral health status. In addition,
there are significant challenges in availability, scope, quality and comparability of economic data at
national, regional and international levels (63–65).
1.6.1 The cost of oral health care
The total direct expenditure for oral diseases among 194 countries amounted to US$ 387 billion or a
global average of about US$ 50 per capita in 2019. This represents about 4.8% of global direct health
expenditures. At the same time, productivity losses from oral diseases were estimated at about US$ 42
per capita, totalling to around US$ 323 billion globally (66).
Box 5. Health expenditure definitions
Direct dental expenditure includes public and private
treatment costs for oral health care (without the costs of
care for lip and oral cavity cancer). Such costs comprise
workforce, facility and service costs covered by public
and private financial sources, including patient out-
of-pocket expenditures. Travel costs are excluded.
Data detailing the share of prevention or specific
interventions as part of direct dental expenditures are
not available (63, 67).
Productivity losses are calculated using the methodology
of the WHO Commission on Macroeconomics and Health
whereby GDP per capita values are multiplied by oral-
disease-specific estimates of DALYs (68). Further details
are provided in Section A.2.
The inequalities of oral health expenditures are
striking, and differences among countries are
very notable. The average per capita expenditure
in low-income countries is US$ 0.52, whereas
high-income countries spend an average of US$
260 per capita – 500 times more. The ratio of
total amounts spent on oral health care is even
worse: all low-income countries together spend
800 times less than all high-income countries
together (see Figs. 13 and 14). The single highest
total amount is spent in the United States with
US$ 134 billion, followed by China with US$ 61
billion; both combined represent a 51% share of
all direct costs globally.
The pattern of unequal spending among the countries reveals four major groups (Fig. 15):
• Group 1:
- 99 countries (about half of WHO Member States) spend very little on oral health care
- 50 countries (about one quarter of countries, among them 34 from the WHO African Region) spend
less than US$ 1 per person per year.
- 50 countries (about one quarter of countries) spend between US$ 1 and US$ 10 per person per year.
• Group 2:
- 49 countries (about one quarter of WHO Member States) spend between US$ 11 and US$ 50 per person
per year.
26
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
• Group 3:
- 31 countries (16% of WHO Member States) spend between US$ 51 and US$ 300 per person per year.
• Group 4:
- 12 countries (6% of countries) spend more than US$ 300 per person per year.
The combined direct dental expenditures of the 13 highest-spending countries equal about US$ 340
billion. This is an 88% share of the global direct expenditure, yet these countries only represent 22.5%
(2.5 billion people) of the world’s population. People in these highest-spending countries benefit from
an average of US$ 136 per capita annual expenditure. The remaining 13% of global direct expenditure
(US$ 47 billion) is shared among 181 countries with 5.3 billion people; their average per capita annual
expenditure is 15 times lower, reaching only US$ 9 per capita each year (66).
Fig. 13 Per capita direct dental expenditure in US$ per WB country income group (2019)
Fig. 14 Total direct dental expenditure in US$ per WB country income group (2019)
27
1.Oral diseases are global public health problems
In terms of WHO regions, the lowest total and per capita direct expenditure was reported from
the South-East Asian Region, with a total expenditure of US$ 0.76 billion and US$ 0.52 per capita
expenditure. The Region of the Americas shows the highest amounts, with US$ 157 billion total and
US$ 155 per capita annual expenditure.
Out-of-pocket costs can be major barriers to accessing oral health care. With private practitioners
predominantly providing services, which often are only partially or not at all covered by government
programmes and/or insurance, patients accessing oral health services must either pay the entire cost
of care or need to cover substantial copayments. Paying for necessary oral health care is one of the
leading reasons for catastrophic health expenditures, resulting in an increased risk of impoverishment
and economic hardship (69, 70). A survey by the WHO European Region Office (2019) showed that
among all households with catastrophic health expenditures, dental expenditures ranked third after
medicines and inpatient care (71). The same survey reported that access to general health care is
much more equitable than access to oral health care. On average, out-of-pocket expenditure for
oral health care within the 28 countries of the European Union was more than 60% of the treatment
costs, and in some Member States, it was close to 100% due to complete exclusion of oral health
care from health coverage.
Fig. 15 Per capita dental expenditures in US$ per country (2019)
Per capita dental
expenditures in US$
Less than $1
$1 to $10
$11 to $50
$51 to $300
More than $300
Data not available
Not applicable
Data Source: Jevdjevic & Listl 2022. Economic impacts of oral diseases in 2019. Map Production: WHO NCD/MND unit. Map Creation
Date: 30 August 2022. Note: N = 194 countries.
28
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
©Julie Pudlowski
The burden
of the main
oral diseases
2
2.1 Dental caries
2.1.1 The burden of untreated dental caries
More than one third of the world’s population lives with untreated dental caries. The disease, also
known as tooth decay or simply cavities, is the most widespread NCD and a major public health problem
for populations and governments worldwide. Untreated dental caries in permanent teeth is the most
prevalent condition among all diseases, affecting more than 2 billion people worldwide. In deciduous
teeth, untreated caries is the single most common chronic childhood disease, affecting 514 million
children worldwide (4, 6, 72).
2.1.2 Prevalence and case numbers of untreated caries of deciduous teeth
The estimated global average prevalence of caries of deciduous teeth is 43%, and 134 of 194 (69% of
countries) WHO Member States have prevalence figures of more than 40% (see Fig. 16).
Prevalence ranges from 46% in upper-middle-income countries to 38% in high-income countries. Case
numbers are highest in lower-middle-income countries (244 million cases) and lowest in high-income
countries (45 million cases; see Table 2 and Fig. 17). Overall, more than three quarters of cases of untreated
caries in deciduous teeth are found in middle-income countries where health systems and resources to
address the burden are often inadequate.
Box 6. What is dental caries and how is it measured?
Dental caries is defined as a gradual loss and
breakdown (decay) of tooth hard tissues (enamel
and dentine) that results when free sugars contained
in food or drink are converted by bacteria into acids
that destroy the tooth over time. Free sugars are all
sugars added to foods by the manufacturer, cook
or consumer, plus sugars that are naturally present
in honey, syrups and fruit juices (22, 73). Caries can
lead to cavities, which are permanently damaged
areas in the hard surface of the teeth (“holes” or
“cavities”) (74).
Dental caries can be measured like all diseases
with prevalence and incidence. In addition, WHO
recommended the use of the DMFT index, which
reports cumulative caries experience over time (75).
Other indicators and caries assessment systems
exist, and new indicator frameworks are now being
considered. The GBD project uses its standard
metrics, such as estimated prevalence, case numbers
and DALYs, in the context of dental caries (72, 76).
Dental caries affects all age groups, starting with the
eruption of the first teeth (deciduous teeth/primary
dentition) and increasing in prevalence until late
adulthood, then remaining at high levels until older
age. The onset of the disease in children younger
than 6 years is early childhood caries, which at times
progresses quickly to complete destruction of the
primary dentition. Children with early childhood
caries have a much higher risk of continued disease
burden in their later life (77–79).
30
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
Fig. 16. Estimated prevalence of dental caries of deciduous teeth per country
Estimated
prevalence of untreated
caries of deciduous teeth
in children 1-9 years, 2019
18.7% - 33.4%
33.4% - 41.4%
41.4% - 45.8%
45.8% - 53.2%
Data not available
Not applicable
Data source: Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. GBD 2019. Seattle: IHME; 2020. Map Production: WHO NCD/MND unit.
Map Creation Date: 30 August 2022. Note. N = 194 countries; data are for children aged 1–9 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 (4).
Table 2. Estimated prevalence and cases of caries of deciduous teeth in 2019 and the percentage change from
1990 to 2019 per WB country income group
WB income
group
Prevalence
(2019)
Cases
(2019)
Percentage change
prevalence
(1990–2019)
Percentage change
cases
(1990–2019)
Low income
40.00%
73 733 740
-3.31%
87.49%
Lower-middle
Income
42.92%
244 114 139
-2.51%
17.37%
Upper-middle
Income
45.61%
151 481 711
-1.84%
-21.22%
High income
38.30%
44 907 180
-3.88%
-11.94%
Global
42.71%
513 829 451
-3.33%
5.56%
Note. Data are for children aged 1–9 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 and UN DESA 2019 (4, 7).
31
2. The burden of the main oral diseases
Fig. 17 Estimated cases and prevalence of caries of deciduous teeth per WB country income group
Note. Data are for children aged 1–9 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 (4).
Among WHO regions, the highest prevalence is estimated for the Western Pacific Region (46%) and the
lowest for the African Region (39%). Case numbers are highest in the South-East Asia Region, with an
estimated 135 million cases, and lowest in the European Region, with an estimated 41 million cases (see
Table 3 and Fig. 18).
Table 3. Estimated prevalence and case numbers of caries of deciduous teeth in 2019 and their percentage
change from 1990 to 2019 per WHO region
WHO region
Prevalence
(2019)
Cases
(2019)
Percentage change
prevalence
(1990–2019)
Percentage change
cases
(1990–2019)
African Region
38.61%
111 024 979
-3.40%
87.19%
Eastern Mediterranean
Region
45.10%
66 378 695
0.60%
44.35%
European Region
39.64%
40 853 621
-7.22%
-22.10%
Region of the Americas
43.21%
57 459 634
-2.21%
-2.29%
South-East Asia Region
43.77%
135 260 519
-1.96%
-3.25%
Western Pacific Region
46.20%
102 138 618
-0.20%
-22.75%
Global
42.71%
513 829 451
-3.33%
5.56%
Note. Data are for children aged 1–9 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 and UN DESA 2019 (4, 7).
32
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
Fig. 18. Estimated cases and prevalence of caries of deciduous teeth per WHO region
Note. Data are for children aged 1–9 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 (4).
2.1.3 Caries of deciduous teeth – trends 1990–2019
Between 1990 and 2019, the global average prevalence of caries of deciduous teeth decreased slightly
by 3% (with the largest decreases in high-income countries). Estimated global average case numbers
increased by 6%. However, this figure masks significant increases in case numbers, with an increase
(87%) that almost doubled in low-income countries as well as a 17% increase in lower-middle-income
countries. Case numbers decreased by 21% in upper-middle-income countries and by 12% in high-
income countries (see Table 2).
A decrease in estimated prevalence is reported for all WHO regions (with the largest decrease in
the European Region at 7%), yet the other decreases are modest. Only the Eastern Mediterranean
Region showed a slight increase in prevalence. Estimated changes in case numbers with the highest
increases were reported for the African Region (87%) and the Eastern Mediterranean Region (44%),
while all other regions showed decreases (with the largest decrease in the Western Pacific Region at
23%; see Table 3).
2.1.4 Prevalence and case numbers of caries of permanent teeth
The estimated global average prevalence of caries of permanent teeth is 29%, and case numbers
reach more than 2 billion cases. Prevalence differences between country income groups are minor.
The highest case numbers are estimated for lower-middle-income countries (816 million) and upper-
middle income countries (690 million). Middle-income countries thus report 75% of cases of untreated
caries in permanent teeth (see Table 4 and Figs. 19 and 20).
33
2. The burden of the main oral diseases
Table 4. Estimated prevalence and cases of caries of permanent teeth in 2019 and the percentage change of
prevalence, cases and population from 1990 to 2019 per WB country income group
WB income
group
Prevalence
(2019)
Cases
(2019)
Percentage
change prevalence
(1990–2019)
Percentage
change cases
(1990–2019)
Percentage
change population
(1990–2019) a
Low
income
30.61%
180 950 660
-0.43%
120.55%
117.98%
Lower-middle
income
28.89%
815 650 762
-0.69%
73.57%
63.25%
Upper-middle
income
27.75%
689 898 365
-4.15%
26.23%
27.97%
High
income
29.30%
331 635 645
-4.64%
16.66%
20.63%
Global
28.70%
2 019 706 083
-2.59%
46.07%
44.79%
Note. Data are for ages greater than 5 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 and UN DESA 2019 (4, 7).
a Population numbers are for total population across all age groups.
Fig. 19. Estimated cases and prevalence of caries of permanent teeth per WB income group
Note. Data are for ages greater than 5 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 (4).
34
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
Fig. 20. Estimated prevalence of caries of permanent teeth per country
Estimated
prevalence of untreated
caries of permanent teeth
in people 5 years+, 2019
23.3% - 30.6%
30.6% - 35.6%
35.6% - 40.6%
40.6% - 55.7%
Data not available
Not applicable
Data source: Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. GBD 2019. Seattle: IHME; 2020. Map Production: WHO NCD/MND unit.
Map Creation Date: 30 August 2022. Note. N = 194 countries; data are age standardized, for ages greater than 5 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 (4).
Table 5. Estimated prevalence and cases of caries of permanent teeth in 2019 and the percentage change of
prevalence, cases and population from 1990 to 2019 per WHO region
WHO region
Prevalence
(2019)
Cases
(2019)
Percentage
change prevalence
(1990–2019)
Percentage
change cases
(1990–2019)
Percentage
change population
(1990–2019) a
African Region
28.50%
262 650 114
-1.66%
119.94%
114.98%
Eastern Mediterranean
Region
32.25%
202 193 940
-0.27%
102.94%
93.08%
European Region
33.63%
293 866 294
-3.91%
6.09%
9.94%
Region of the Americas
28.24%
264 462 149
-0.05%
46.35%
40.70%
South-East Asia Region
28.69%
525 752 700
0.67%
65.26%
52.38%
Western Pacific Region
25.41%
463 936 789
-6.50%
20.37%
24.96%
Global
28.70%
2 019 706 083
-2.59%
46.07%
44.79%
Note. Data are for ages greater than 5 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 and UN DESA 2019 (4, 7).
a Population numbers are for total population across all age groups.
35
2. The burden of the main oral diseases
Estimated prevalence for WHO regions range from 25% (Western Pacific Region) to 34% (European
Region). Case numbers are highest in the South-East Asia Region (526 million) and Western Pacific Region
(464 million; see Table 5 and Fig. 21).
Fig. 21. Estimated cases and prevalence of caries of permanent teeth per WHO region
Note. Data are for ages greater than 5 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 (4).
2.1.5 Caries of permanent teeth – trends 1990–2019
Over almost a 30-year period, the number of cases increased by about 640 million cases, despite a
slight decrease in prevalence (-2.6%). This significant increase in caries burden is mainly driven by the
rise in case numbers due to the population growth in low- and lower-middle-income countries, where
prevalence increases of 121% and 74% respectively were reported (see Table 4).
The WHO African Region showed the highest increases (120%), followed by the Eastern Mediterranean
Region with 103%. The lowest increase was estimated for the European Region with a 6% increase.
Between 1990 and 2019, prevalence was estimated to remain stable or decrease slightly in all WHO
regions, with the strongest decrease in the Western Pacific Region (-6%; see Table 5).
2.1.6 Risk factors, determinants and impacts of dental caries
Dental caries is a multifactorial disease, and its development is linked to a complex web of individual,
family and community-related factors that include the social and physical environment, behaviour and
health services as well as commercial determinants, all acting over the life-course time (80, 81).
36
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
However, the consumption of free sugars in food and beverages is the most important risk factor for
dental caries and is one of the common risks for NCDs. High sugar consumption is directly related to
higher caries activity, and restricting intake of sugars decreases incidence and severity of dental caries.
In addition, self-care and personal oral hygiene practices can significantly reduce the development and
slow down the progression of caries. This is the rationale for recommending to brush teeth twice daily
with a fluoride toothpaste to reduce the risk of caries in all age groups.
Untreated caries has many negative impacts in different phases of life. Repeated episodes of pain as well
as chewing and sleeping difficulties reduce quality of life and productivity. Caries is a major cause of
productivity losses at work, leads to missed educational opportunities and contributes to poor academic
performance in school. Severe untreated caries with systemic inflammatory reactions from pulp infections
is also a contributing factor to underweight and stunting in children (36, 82–87).
2.2 Severe periodontal disease
2.2.1 Global burden of severe periodontal disease
Severe periodontal disease (see Box 7 for definition) is widespread, with a global prevalence of about
19% in people aged greater than 15 years, representing more than 1 billion cases worldwide.Prevalence
across country income groups is similar, yet case numbers are highest in lower-middle-income countries
(437 million) and lowest in low-income countries (80 million; see Fig. 22 and Table 6). Prevalence of severe
periodontal disease starts in late adolescence, peaks around 55 years of age and remains high until old age.
Men and women are almost equally affected (88, 89). Fig. 23 provides an overview of prevalence per country.
©WHO
37
2. The burden of the main oral diseases
Box 7. What is severe periodontal disease?
Periodontal disease is a chronic inflammation of the
soft and hard tissues that support and anchor the
teeth. Periodontal diseases include gingivitis (gum
disease), a superficial and reversible inflammation
of the gum resulting in swelling and bleeding. In
the presence of other accelerating factors, such as
tobacco use, systemic diseases or a compromised
immune response, gingivitis may develop into
periodontitis, thereby affecting the deeper gum
tissues and bone. The loss of attachment (“pocket”)
eventually leads to increased mobility and tooth
loss. Only severe periodontal disease, defined as the
presence of a pocket of more than 6 mm depth, is a
condition of public health concern (4, 89).
Fig. 22. Estimated cases and prevalence of severe periodontal disease per WB country income group
Note. Data are age standardized, for ages greater than 15 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 (4).
Table 6. Estimated prevalence and cases of severe periodontal disease in 2019 and the percentage change of
prevalence, cases and population from 1990 to 2019 per World Bank income group
WB income group
Prevalence
(2019)
Cases
(2019)
Percentage
change prevalence
(1990–2019)
Percentage
change cases
(1990–2019)
Percentage
change population
(1990–2019) a
Low income
19.71%
80 008 079
0.73%
129.75%
117.98%
Lower-middle income
19.80%
436 697 336
17.24%
124.66%
63.25%
Upper-middle income
18.19%
386 443 138
34.98%
96.83%
27.97%
High income
17.65%
176 251 937
18.71%
51.43%
20.63%
Global
18.82%
1 079 927 025
23.96%
99.18%
44.79%
Note. Data are age standardized, for ages greater than 15 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 and UN DESA 2019 (4, 7).
a Population numbers are for total population across all age groups.
38
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
Fig. 23. Estimated prevalence of severe periodontal disease per country
Estimated
prevalence of severe
periodontal disease in
people 15 years+, 2019
2.9% - 10.6%
10.6% - 19.6%
19.6% - 27.3%
27.3% - 36.7%
Data not available
Not applicable
Data source: Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. GBD 2019. Seattle: IHME; 2020. Map Production: WHO NCD/MND unit. Map Creation
Date: 30 August 2022. Note. N = 194 countries; data are age standardized, for ages greater than 15 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 (4).
Among the WHO regions, prevalence ranges in a narrow band between 16% (Western Pacific Region) and
23% (African Region), while the case numbers reflect the demographic share of the respective regions,
with the South-East Asia Region and Western Pacific Region showing the highest case numbers and the
Eastern Mediterranean Region showing the lowest (see Fig. 24 and Table 7).
Fig. 24. Estimated cases and prevalence of severe periodontal disease per WHO region
Note. Data are age standardized, for ages greater than 15 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 (4).
39
2. The burden of the main oral diseases
Table 7. Estimated prevalence and cases of severe periodontal disease in 2019 and the percentage change of
prevalence, cases and population from 1990 to 2019 per WHO region
WHO region
Prevalence
(2019)
Cases
(2019)
Percentage
change prevalence
(1990–2019)
Percentage
change cases
(1990–2019)
Percentage
change population
(1990–2019) a
African Region
22.80%
144 745 633
2.47%
136.93%
114.98%
Eastern Mediterranean
Region
17.37%
82 864 263
10.42%
149.44%
93.08%
European Region
17.89%
136 209 156
16.13%
34.14%
9.94%
Region of the Americas
18.89%
148 617 765
19.74%
89.37%
40.70%
South-East Asia Region
20.77%
306 964 138
22.66%
125.95%
52.38%
Western Pacific Region
16.28%
258 963 653
39.19%
97.51%
24.96%
Global
18.82%
1 079 927 025
23.96%
99.18%
44.79%
Note. Data are age standardized, for ages greater than 15 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 and UN DESA 2019.
a Population numbers are for total population across all age groups.
2.2.2 Trends in disease burden 1990–2019
Prevalence and case numbers of severe periodontal disease increased significantly between 1990 and
2019. Estimated case numbers increased by almost 540 million, while estimated prevalence increased
by 24%. Upper-middle-income countries showed the highest increase in prevalence (35%); the group of
low-income countries was estimated to have almost no change in prevalence. Case numbers, however,
increased the most in this country group (130%), as opposed to high-income countries with the smallest
increase in case numbers (51%; see Table 6).
Among the WHO regions, the Western Pacific Region had the highest increase in prevalence between
1990 and 2019, while the highest increase in case numbers was estimated for the Eastern Mediterranean
Region (see Table 7).
Prevalence of severe periodontitis increases with age (see Fig. 10). With the global demographic changes
characterized by larger ageing populations and increasing longevity, an even higher global burden of
severe periodontal disease may be expected in the future.
2.2.3 Severe periodontal disease, inequalities and general health
As for other NCDs, there are significant inequalities among population groups resulting from differences
in exposure to risk factors and wider determinants of health. A greater disease burden is found in
populations with lower socioeconomic status, income or education as well as among those living in rural
areas. The consequences of severe periodontal disease for people affected include difficulties with eating
or speaking, particularly when teeth are loose or already lost. Social interaction, general well-being and
quality of life may also be significantly impaired.
40
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
Poor oral hygiene is a major behavioural risk factor for periodontal disease, together with common
NCD risk factors such as tobacco use (90).
Severe periodontal disease is closely interlinked with major NCDs; particularly an association with
unmanaged type 2 diabetes is well documented. Good periodontal health improves glycaemic control;
deterioration of periodontal health may be an early indicator of poorly managed diabetes (44, 91).
2.3 Edentulism
2.3.1 The global burden of severe tooth loss and edentulism
A person is said to suffer from severe tooth loss when fewer than nine teeth are remaining in the mouth,
which includes complete toothlessness, or edentulism (4, 92). Losing teeth is generally the end point of a
lifelong history of oral disease, mainly advanced dental caries and severe periodontal disease, but can also
be due to trauma and other causes, all possibly leading to tooth extraction. It can also be a consequence
of weak oral health care services in resource-poor settings where restorative and prosthetic care are
either not generally available or unaffordable (88).
Losing teeth is often seen as an inevitable result of ageing and is socially accepted in many cultures.
However, losing teeth and living with reduced or absent dentition can be psychologically traumatic, socially
damaging and functionally limiting to the individual affected. Balanced nutrition may become difficult,
especially when partial or full dentures to replace missing teeth are not accessible or affordable (54).
©Julie Pudlowski
41
2. The burden of the main oral diseases
The estimated global average prevalence of complete tooth loss is almost 7%, with more than 350
million cases worldwide (see Table 8). The lowest prevalence is estimated for low-income countries (3%),
followed by lower-middle-income countries (4.5%) and upper-middle-income countries (8%). The highest
prevalence rates of 10.5% are estimated for high-income countries, as well as highest case numbers with
98 million cases (see Fig. 25). The European Region has the highest prevalence among the 6 WHO regions
and, together with the Western Pacific Region, also has the highest numbers of cases (see Table 9 and
Fig. 26). The African Region has the lowest prevalence and case numbers.
Table 8. Estimated prevalence and cases of edentulism in 2019 and the percentage change of prevalence, cases
and population from 1990 to 2019 per WB country income group
WB income group
Prevalence
(2019)
Cases
(2019)
Percentage change
prevalence
(1990–2019)
Percentage change
cases
(1990–2019)
Low
income
3.10%
10 221 945
-4.35%
118.01%
Lower-middle
income
4.56%
87 256 962
2.56%
103.26%
Upper-middle
income
7.89%
153 803 699
30.41%
105.66%
High
income
10.52%
98 065 451
5.63%
39.02%
Global
6.82%
350 060 709
8.02%
81.12%
Note. Data are age standardized, for ages greater than 20 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 and UN DESA 2019
Fig. 25. Estimated cases and prevalence of edentulism per WB country income group
Note. Data are age standardized, for ages greater than 20 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 (4).
42
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
Table 9. Estimated prevalence and case numbers of edentulism in 2019 and the percentage change of
prevalence, cases and population from 1990 to 2019 per WHO region
WHO Region
Prevalence
(2019)
Cases
(2019)
Percentage change
prevalence
(1990–2019)
Percentage change
cases
(1990–2019)
African Region
3.34%
17 369 660
-11.75%
105.84%
Eastern Mediterranean
Region
5.93%
24 454 031
-2.75%
130.89%
European Region
12.42%
88 199 746
8.95%
30.01%
Region of the Americas
10.54%
74 843 184
14.51%
88.25%
South-East Asia Region
4.06%
52 687 418
16.39%
123.36%
Western Pacific Region
6.24%
91 909 753
39.15%
114.86%
Global
6.82%
350 060 709
8.02%
81.12%
Note. Data are age standardized, for ages greater than 20 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 and UN DESA 2019.
Fig. 26. Estimated cases and prevalence of edentulism per WHO region
Note. Data are age-standardized, for ages greater than 20 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 (4).
For people older than 60 years the global average prevalence of edentulism is much higher, estimated
at 22.7% – almost one in four persons older than 60 have no teeth left. Rates vary across country income
groups, with low-income countries showing the lowest rate (11.7%) and high-income countries reporting
the highest rate (25.4%). Among the WHO regions, the highest rate is estimated for the European Region
(31.3%) and the lowest for the African Region (12.1%; see Fig. 27).
The burden of DALYs due to tooth loss is estimated at more than 9.5 million (GBD combines severe tooth
loss and edentulism to calculate DALYs).
43
2. The burden of the main oral diseases
Fig. 27. Estimated prevalence of edentulism
Estimated
prevalence of edentulism
in people 60 years+, 2019
5.0% - 16.4%
16.4% - 26.2%
26.2% - 34.1%
34.1% - 50.9%
Data not available
Not applicable
Data source: Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. GBD 2019. Seattle: IHME; 2020. Map Production: WHO NCD/MND unit.
Map Creation Date: 30 August 2022. Note. N = 194 countries; data are for ages greater than 60 years, both sexes, from GBD 2019 (4).
2.3.2 Trends in disease burden 1990–2019
The global average prevalence of edentulism increased by 8%
and the estimated global case numbers rose by 81% between
1990 and 2019, representing an additional 157 million cases
(see Table 8). During this time span, only low-income countries
saw a modest decrease in prevalence (-4%), while all other
country income groups had increases, which were highest in
upper-middle-income countries (30%). Case numbers more
than doubled in all country income groups, except in high-
income countries, where case numbers increased by 39%.
Among the WHO regions, the African Region had the largest
decrease in prevalence (-12%), followed by the Eastern
Mediterranean Region (-3%; see Table 9). Prevalence
increased in all other WHO regions, with the most growth in
the Western Pacific Region (39%). Case numbers more than
doubled in all WHO regions, except for the European Region
(30% increase) and the Region of the Americas (88% increase).
The trends measured in DALYs follow similar patterns, with
a global increase of 80% from 1990 to 2019.
©Julie Pudlowski
44
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
2.4 Oral cancer
2.4.1 Global and regional burden of lip and
oral cavity cancer
Oral cancers are a disease group with high mortality
and morbidity. The IARC Global Cancer Observatory
(GLOBOCAN) estimated 377 713 new cases and
177 757 deaths from lip and oral cavity cancers
worldwide in 2020(93, 94). The number of estimated
incident cases of lip and oral cavity cancers ranked
16th among all cancers (for both sexes); combined
with cases of oropharyngeal cancers, the rank
increased to the 13th most common cancer
worldwide. The global incidence rate for men (13.1
per 100 000) is more than 2.5 times higher than for
women (5 per 100 000). Mortality rates for men are
more than double compared to women (see Figs. 28
and 29). Lip and oral cavity cancer is the 11th most
common cancer for men (all ages), with a share of
3.5% of all cancers.
Box 8. Definition of oral cancer
The umbrella term oral cancer includes malignant
neoplasms, predominantly squamous cell
carcinomas occurring in the mucosa of the lips and
oral cavity (tongue, upper and lower gums, floor of
the mouth, palate and other parts of the mouth),
corresponding to the International Classification of
Diseases (ICD-10) codes C00–C06. The IARC groups lip
and oral cancers together under the generally used
term oral cancer, yet they are cancers with distinct
epidemiological and clinical profiles (93, 95). Due to
increasing incidence of cancers of the tonsils and
other parts of the oropharynx (ICD-10 C09 and C10)
linked to human papillomavirus (HPV) infections,
they are now also recognized as global public health
problems under the term oropharyngeal cancer. This
report uses oral cancer for lip and oral cavity cancer,
unless otherwise stated.
Prevalence of oral cancer differs significantly by
regions, countries and population groups (see Fig. 30).
Middle- and high-income countries carried almost the
entire burden in terms of case numbers in 2020, with
estimates for lower-middle-income and high-income
countries encompassing more than three quarters of
global estimated cases (5). The WHO South-East Asia
Region shows the highest incidence and mortality of
all WHO regions, with rates almost double the global
average (see Figs. 29, 30 and 31). Oral cancers are the
most common cancer for males in the region, with men
aged 25–39 accounting for more than one quarter of
all cancer cases. Overall, inequalities are significant
with people with low income, socio-economic status
or other disadvantage being more frequently affected.
Treatment availability, outcomes and survival rates are
generally better in high-income countries (96, 97).
©WHO/Ahmad Yusni
45
2. The burden of the main oral diseases
Fig. 28. Incidence and mortality rates of lip and oral cavity cancer per WB country income group
Note. Data are age-standardized, for ages greater than 30 years, from GLOBOCAN 2020 (5).
Fig. 29. Incidence and mortality rates of lip and oral cavity cancer per WHO region
Note. Data are age-standardized, for ages greater than 30 years, from GLOBOCAN 2020 (5).
46
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
Fig. 30. Estimated incidence rates of lip and oral cavity cancer
Estimated
incidence rates
of lip and oral
cavity cancer in people
30 years+ per 100 000
population (2020)
0.0 - 3.1
3.1 - 5.4
5.4 - 8.1
8.1 - 11.0
11.0 - 14.6
14.6 - 47.6
Data not available
Not applicable
Data source: Ferlay et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France; 2020.
Map Production: WHO NCD/MND unit. Map Creation Date: 30 August 2022. Note. N = 176 countries; data are age-standardized, for ages 30–85
years, both sexes, from GLOBOCAN 2020 (5).
Fig. 31. Estimated mortality rates of lip and oral cavity cancer
Estimated
mortality rates
of lip and oral
cavity cancer in people
30 years+ per 100 000
population (2020)
0.0 - 1.1
1.1 - 2.1
2.1 - 3.2
3.2 - 4.9
4.9 - 8.3
8.3 - 18.9
Data not available
Not applicable
Data source: Ferlay et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France; 2020.
Map Production: WHO NCD/MND unit. Map Creation Date: 30 August 2022. Note. N = 176 countries; data are age-standardized, for ages 30–85 years, both
sexes, from GLOBOCAN 2020 (5).
47
2. The burden of the main oral diseases
The 136 000 new cases and 75 000 deaths occurring in India alone account for 36% of all new cases and
42% of deaths from oral cancers worldwide. The South-East Asia Region has a 52% share of deaths from
oral cancer (97).
Variations of oral cancer are also observed relative to location. The tongue is the most common site of
oral cavity cancers in Europe, the United States and Japan, whereas the buccal and lip mucosa are more
common cancer locations in some regions of Asia. These regional variations in the incidence of oral cavity
cancer subsites relate to the distribution of the main risk factors (such as tobacco and alcohol use in
Western countries and betel quid and tobacco chewing in South and Southeast Asia).
2.4.2 Oral cancer – trends over time
Observed trends in incidence and mortality of oral cancers vary according to geographical location, age
group and sex. Differences largely follow changes in tobacco consumption, thereby reflecting the stage
and degree of the tobacco epidemic of the respective region. Overall, there is a long-term downward trend
in the incidence of oral cancers among men, while it is increasing or stable among women in countries
where the tobacco epidemics reached their peak some time ago. By contrast, and not unexpectedly,
oral cancers have increased in countries with rising tobacco use.
2.4.3 Specific risk factors of oral cancer
The main risk factors for lip, oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are tobacco use, alcohol consumption
and betel quid use, which act independently or in combination (see Section 1.2.4). Other risk factors
with lower impact include diet and socioeconomic position (98–100).
Lip and oral cavity cancers are the third most common cancer related to tobacco use, and about one
quarter of oral cancer cases are related to harmful alcohol consumption. Both risk factors combined
substantially increase the risk of oral cavity cancers.
The group of Human Papilloma Viruses (HPV) is a well-recognized cause of about 4.5% of all cancers
worldwide. HPV types 16 and 18 are now the most common cause of oropharyngeal cancers (base of
the tongue, tonsils and back of the throat). Increases in cases have been reported in many countries
where previously low incidence rates were seen, particularly among young male white adults. With
rising prevalence of HPV infection in specific age cohorts, the incidence of oropharyngeal cancer in
men surpassed the incidence of cervical cancer in women in the United Kingdom in 2016. Survival
rates of HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers are better compared to patients with HPV-negative
cancers. In many countries, public health agencies advocate for gender-neutral HPV vaccination as a
populationwide primary prevention strategy to reduce incidence of HPV-associated cancers in both
males and females (101–103).
Specific risk factors for lip and oral cavity cancers are smokeless tobacco (chewing and snuff) and betel
quid (paan), substances that have long been established as strong carcinogens (104). Chewing betel
quid without tobacco is estimated to increase the risk of oral cavity cancer 2.5-fold; in combination with
tobacco the risk increases 7.74-fold, with a cumulative effect over the life course (105). More research is
needed to assess the impact of e-cigarettes and vaping nicotine products on oral cancer.
48
Global oral health status report: Towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030
Box 9. Betel quid: a dangerous yet popular carcinogen
Betel quid chewing with tobacco is one of the most
common forms of smokeless tobacco and is used by
approximately 600 million individuals worldwide, with
a higher prevalence in South and South-East Asia and
the Pacific islands. The effect of betel quid chewing is
a general stimulation, similar to the effects of tobacco
or caffeine (110).
Betel quid is a mixture of areca nut (nut of a palm tree,
Areca catechu), slaked lime (calcium hydroxide) and betel
leaf (leaf of the piper betel vine), and it can have tobacco
(mainly in South-Central Asia) or not (in East Asia and
Melanesia). All of the ingredients are wrapped inside the
betel leaf and made into a bunch commonly known as a
“quid,” which is then chewed. It stains teeth and tissues
dark red and is spit out after chewing for a few hours.
Box 10. IARC handbook Vol. 19 - on oral cancer prevention
The IARC handbooks of cancer prevention provide
comprehensive reviews and consensus evaluations
of interventions and strategies that aim to reduce
cancer incidence or mortality at the population level.
The process involves a working group of international,
interdisciplinary experts who review the literature and
assess the body of evidence.
The volume 19 of the IARC handbook covers the
topic of oral cancer prevention, both primary and
secondary prevention. In terms of primary prevention,
the handbook evaluates the effectiveness of quitting
exposure to the known risk factors for oral cancer –
tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption, and chewing
of products (including betel quid) that contain
smokeless tobacco, areca nut, or both – in reducing
oral cancer incidence and mortality. In the subsequent
section, the handbook assesses the impact of
interventions aimed at quitting the use of smokeless
tobacco and areca nut products; the impact of policies
pertinent to smokeless tobacco and areca nut control
is also assessed. In terms of secondary prevention, the
effectiveness of screening by clinical oral examination
is evaluated. The handbook also covers other related
topics, such as the global burden of oral cancer and
potentially malignant disorders, their natural history,
risk factors for oral cancer, the prevalence of smokeless
tobacco and areca nut chewing in the different WHO
regions, screening methods and technologies as well
as screening programmes and the determinants of
participation in screening.
Publication of the IARC handbook on oral cancer
prevention, volume 19, is scheduled for the end of
2022. This handbook will help policy-makers develop
evidence-based interventions or recommendations
to reduce oral cancer risk at the population level. See
https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/
Iarc-Handbooks-Of-Cancer-Prevention.
©WHO/Yoshi Shimizu
49
2. The burden of the main oral diseases
Oral cancer contrib